Skip to main content

Shuttershock and Olympus 75-300

Since a couple of months I own the Olympus 75-300 III. And since day one, I wasn't happy with the results I got. 
All the pictures shot at +/- 300 mm where soft and looked like there was motion blur. How's that possible? I tried it at a 1/1000th of a second, but still the motion blur in my pictures. I regret that I ever sold my Pentax with the 55-300 for this awfull lens!
But... Most reviews of this lens are positive. Is my copy of this lens bad?
I then figured out by reading forums that it could be a phenomena called 'shuttershock'. It that case, the shock of the shutter causes enough movement so the image is blurred.
For example:

How to fix this?
My camera has several drive modes, including one called 'anti-shock'. And that does magic.
In that mode The pictures are sharp again. No motion blur is visible! 
The downside of this mode is that the fasted drivemode can't be used.

Lightroom 4 edit in error fix

Many people who upgraded their copy of Lightroom to version 4 or installed a fresh copy of version 4 suffer a strange problem: An error when exporting to a external editor like DXO Optics Pro, or NIK filters, etc.

When you want to edit you picture in any other program you wil get the next error:
Unexpected error performing command: bad argument #1 to 'lower'(string expected, got nil)

A very strange error, and after setting the stuff again, the error was still there. After some searching on the internet I found a lot of people with this problem. But it was hard to find a solution.

One solution which seems ridiculous is installing Adobe Photoshop (Elements). I don't exactly why this works, but it does! 

All you need to do is installing a trail version of Adobe Photoshop (Elements) and everything is fine. 

I really hope Adobe will fix this problem, because installing a 1,5GB package (PSE) is a little bit awkward for this problem. 

If you're a little bit more confident in editing some settings on your computer try the next (it worked for me):

First backup you registry in case something goes wrong

1) Open Notepad
2) Copy and paste everything in bold below into Notepad

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\Photoshop.exe]
"Path"="C:\\Program Files\\Adobe\\Adobe Photoshop CS5\\"
@="C:\\Program Files\\Adobe\\Adobe Photoshop CS5\\Photoshop.exe"

3) Go File > Save As
4) In "File Type" Select "All files"
5) Name it "LightroomPatch.reg" and save to your Desktop
6) Close notepad and double-click "LightroomPatch.reg".
7) When it asks if you trust the source, click "yes"

This fix tells where Photoshop is installed to Lightroom, even when Photoshop is not installed. Normally Lightroom checkes if and where Photoshop is installed, if it's not found, in checkes if and where Photoshop elements is installed. When nothing is found, that option won't be available in Lightroom and you can use other programs to edit in. The problem is that when Lightroom don't find Photoshop (Elements), the options to edit in other programs are somehow broken. Now you will see the option to edit your picture in: C:\\Program Files\*** etc. No big deal. But I still hope Adobe will fix this problem soon.


In Lightroom 4.1, this error has been fixed. 

Popular posts from this blog

DXO Optics Pro vs. Corel Aftershot Pro

After using Aftershot Pro for a couple of days, I made this comparison to DXO Optics Pro 7. The difference is really clear. The colors in DXO (on the left) are much more realistic than the colors in Aftershot Pro (on the right).The settings where with the default settings with some tweaking for the contrast, exposure and noise reduction. (WB, saturation etc where left to default settings).
In the first picture, I could get the colors and contrast right with Aftershot Pro, with DXO I had to tweak the contrast, but after all, the picture is really nice and natural.

In this picture, at first view, I really like the version from Aftershot Pro. But this picture isn't real. The saturation of the picture is to much and the contrast unreal. The DXO version is a little bit foggy, but more like reality. With some tweaking of the curves, the DXO version will pop a little bit more.

This one shows the biggest difference. Removing chromatic aberrations. With DXO it was very simple, even if the…

Adobe Lightroom 4 vs. DXO Optics Pro 7

One day ago, Adobe released Lightroom 4.0. Two months ago, DXO released DXO Optics Pro 7. These two updates changed a lot in both software. How do they compare?
I'm using DXO Optics Pro for quite a while. I really like the simplicity and results. For landscape and nature photography the build in HDR tools are great. The possibilities to gain details from highlights is unsurpassed. The lack of speed of version 6 has been fixed in version 7. 
Is DXO still my favorite, or does Lightroom beat it? That question will I answer on the end. First of all I will compare them.
workflowLightroom is still the best workflow tool on the marketWorkflow is not the best in DXO. You need a tool like Picassa to do the file managementwinner: Lightroom, DXO doens't have real workflow toolsimage qualityLightroom gets very much detail from images, the lens correction is okay, but not very good,DXO get's a little less details from my images, but the lens correction tools are the best ever se…

Lightroom vs. DXO. vs. Photodirector

A little comparison of three RAW-converters. This comparison is not about how the program themselves works, but about the result of how one RAW-file is processed.

The version of the software I used:

DXO Optics Pro: 6.5
Adobe Lightroom: 3
Cyberlink Photodirector: 2011
For this test I used a photo of a little owl posted before on this weblog. The picture was a little underexposed and with a cheap lens (Tamron AF 70-300mm Di F/4.0-5.6 Macro 1:2). So there's work to do for the RAWconverter.